A person browses a catalog, fills a cart and pays with a card.
aCommerce
The buyer is now an agent.
eCommerce was built for a person at a screen. aCommerce is commerce conducted agent to agent under a human's mandate. The human sets policy. The agents execute. SILS supplies the trust at the moment of settlement.1
Two models
Same purchase. A different buyer.
The change is not a faster checkout. The party at the counter changes. That changes what a merchant needs to know, and what it should never see.
An agent with a verified owner and a funded mandate negotiates, contracts and settles with a merchant agent.1
Side by side
What changes, row by row.
The SILS column describes design scope on Revolution Network. Status is stated per row.
| Dimension | eCommerce | aCommerce on SILS | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who acts | A person browses, clicks and checks out. | A personal agent negotiates and settles with a merchant agent. The person sets policy once.1 | In development |
| Who is buying | An account login and a saved card. The card proves funds, not who stands behind an agent. | A soulbound agent name such as shopping.rob.revo, bound to a verified owner. It cannot be transferred.5 | In development |
| Authority | A session and a stored card. Spending limits live with the card issuer. | A standing mandate: per-transaction cap, per-period cap, categories, expiry and a kill switch. Its hash is anchored on chain.3 | In development |
| Privacy | Checkout collects name, contact and payment details. Mandates in the market today are plaintext, so a merchant that reads one learns the budget.2 | The merchant verifies payment, age and jurisdiction in one zero-knowledge proof. It never sees the wallet, the balance, the history or the budget.4 | In development |
| Pricing | The seller can see who is buying and adjust the price. | The buyer commits to a sealed price ceiling. The merchant never sees willingness to pay.69 | Planned |
| Discovery | Buyers pull from catalogs. Merchants pay to be found. | The buyer agent posts an intent with a funds proof. Bonded merchant agents respond with signed offers.6 | Planned |
| Payment | Each payment is authorized and settled on its own. | USDC settles on Revolution with escrow in three modes: full, milestone and stream. Micro-payments net off chain. One settlement carries the batch.7 | In development |
| Who gets paid | The platform takes its cut outside the sale.2 | Splits are fixed at funding and paid in the settlement: merchant, affiliate and network fee.7 | In development |
| Trust | Reviews and ratings. Open agent registries invite Sybils.8 | Merchant reputation is backed by bonded stake. Records follow the verified owner, so a bad record cannot be discarded.8 | In development |
| Disputes | Chargebacks through the card network. | Escrow holds funds until delivery. Adjudicated disputes pay restitution from the merchant's bond.8 | Planned |
| Compliance | Documents collected and stored by each merchant. | Proofs, not documents. No personal data goes on chain.9 | In development |
SILS capabilities run on Revolution Network. Revolution's identity and aCommerce layers are specified, not built.10
What the merchant learns
eCommerce collects. aCommerce proves.
The same 24.00 USDC digital purchase, two ways. On the left, the record a merchant keeps today. On the right, what it receives with SILS.
Illustrative. Names and values are examples. SILS Proof is in development. Proof internals are not shown.
One purchase on SILS
Six steps. One settlement.
Identity, mandates, intents, offers and escrow are free to prepare. Settlement carries the fee.7
Set the mandate
A verified owner creates shopping.rob.revo and signs its limits. The hash is anchored.
In developmentPublish intent
The agent posts what it needs, a sealed price ceiling and a proof that escrow covers it.
PlannedOffer
Bonded merchant agents that pass the filter respond with signed offers.
PlannedProve, privately
The agent accepts and funds escrow. One ZK proof covers payment, age, jurisdiction and mandate.
In developmentDeliver
The merchant verifies the proof, learns yes, and delivers.
In developmentSettle and split
Escrow releases on confirmation. Merchant, affiliate and network fee are paid in one transaction.
In developmentWhere SILS fits
The aCommerce stack, mapped to SILS.
Revolution specifies aCommerce in five layers. Each layer depends only on the layers below it. SILS products sit on each one.10
Works with what merchants run
Built to plug in, not to replace.
SILS works beside a merchant's existing processor. It does not issue cards, run a catalog or custody fiat.11
| Standard | How aCommerce on SILS connects |
|---|---|
| x402 | SILS Proof is a scheme inside x402. A .revo name can be the payee. |
| AP2 | Canonical mandate format. Hashes are anchored. Intent proofs run over AP2 fields. |
| MCP and A2A | Identity, proofs, intents and settlement as tools and agent cards. |
| Card agentic tokens | The card authorization reference is recorded with the settlement. |
| ERC-8004 | A read-only mirror of every agent identity, with transfer disabled. |
Design intent on Revolution Network. Not yet built.
Sources
- Revolution Network Whitepaper v2.0, October 2026, draft for review, §08 and §15.2 (ACommerce: commerce conducted agent to agent under a human's mandate).
- Revolution Network Whitepaper v2.0, October 2026, draft for review, §01 and §1.2.
- Revolution Network Whitepaper v2.0, October 2026, draft for review, §7.4 and §8.4.
- Revolution Network Whitepaper v2.0, October 2026, draft for review, §6.4 and §8.6.
- Revolution Network Whitepaper v2.0, October 2026, draft for review, §6.3.
- Revolution Network Whitepaper v2.0, October 2026, draft for review, §8.7.
- Revolution Network Whitepaper v2.0, October 2026, draft for review, §2.1, §8.3, §8.5 and §8.10.
- Revolution Network Whitepaper v2.0, October 2026, draft for review, §1.2 and §8.8, citing Xiong et al., ERC-8004 reputation Sybil study, arXiv, June 2026. Ethereum EIPs, "ERC-8004: Trustless Agents" (Draft). eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8004
- Revolution Network Whitepaper v2.0, October 2026, draft for review, §2.1, §5.1 and §13.2. Section 13.2 maps design to emerging rules and is not legal advice.
- Revolution Network Whitepaper v2.0, October 2026, draft for review, §02 (Figure 1) and §8.1.
- Revolution Network Whitepaper v2.0, October 2026, draft for review, §8.6 and §8.9.